Candlestick chart patterns: read the prices before the pattern
Reconstruct open, high, low, and close, understand fill conventions, and distinguish a descriptive candle pattern from a prediction.
Read the guideLearn a repeatable approach to chart identity, intervals, scales, price changes, and the difference between a visible pattern and an explanation.

A stock chart is a compressed record of prices, not a complete explanation of a business. Before looking for a pattern, work out what has been measured, over which period, and on what scale. That small pause can prevent a surprisingly large misunderstanding. The same sequence can look calm in a multi-year view and dramatic in a tightly cropped daily view, even when neither picture contains a calculation error.
This guide uses invented numbers to explain a repeatable reading process. It is about interpreting and publishing charts, not selecting investments. You can follow along with the stock chart examples and then change the display in the chart studio. Every studio dataset is explicitly illustrative; it does not represent a real stock or a live quotation.
Read the instrument name, symbol, currency, exchange or venue where relevant, data provider, and timestamp. A familiar company name is not enough to identify a particular security. Different share classes and listings can have different prices. A quoted value also needs a unit: 125 could mean dollars, cents, index points, or a rebased performance level.
Next inspect the sampling interval. A daily candle summarizes a session. A weekly candle summarizes a week. A chart covering one year is not necessarily built from daily observations; the displayed history and the interval of each observation are separate choices. Write both in a published caption rather than expecting readers to infer them from sparse axis labels.
Finally, identify whether the session is complete. A value recorded partway through a period may change before the close. Do not place a partial day beside completed daily observations without making the difference visible. A screenshot needs an as-of time because it cannot update itself once shared.
A line chart usually connects one selected price per interval. An open-high-low-close display preserves four prices. Fidelity’s guide to setting up charts explains this difference between line and OHLC views. The important practical consequence is that chart type changes how much detail is visible, not the underlying security’s behavior.
Imagine an invented session opening at 100, reaching 106, falling to 97, and closing at 103. A close-only point shows 103. A candle also shows the opening value and the full observed range. Neither representation tells you exactly when the high and low occurred. That chronology requires more detailed observations.
Choose a line when the purpose is to communicate the broad path of a selected measure. Choose candles when the relationship between open, high, low, and close matters to the explanation. Avoid using a dense candle display simply because it looks more sophisticated. Detail that cannot be read at the final image size is not useful detail.
On a linear price axis, equal vertical distances represent equal absolute changes. A move from 20 to 30 takes the same vertical space as a move from 80 to 90. Those moves are not equal in percentage terms: the first is 50%, while the second is 12.5%. This is arithmetic, not a difference in market strength inferred from the shape.
A logarithmic axis instead gives equal proportional changes equal spacing. That can be useful when examining a wide range of positive prices. Clearly label the scale because the same observations produce a different-looking curve when the transformation changes. Zero and negative values also need special consideration and cannot simply be placed on an ordinary logarithmic price axis.
A stock-price line does not always need to begin at zero, but a cropped scale should never be hidden. Include readable ticks and enough context to prevent a small variation from being mistaken for a much larger absolute movement. Treat a dramatic slope as a reason to inspect the axes, not as evidence by itself.
Suppose a price rises from 80 to 88. The simple price change is ten percent: divide the eight-unit difference by the starting value. A chart of that price alone does not automatically include distributions, trading costs, taxes, exchange-rate changes, or the effect of cash entering or leaving an account.
For a publication, state exactly which quantity appears. “Price change” is more precise than an unqualified “return” when only prices were used. When comparing a price series with a total-return series, explain the different definitions instead of allowing similar-looking percentage labels to suggest equivalence.
Corporate actions create another documentation question. A split-adjusted history and a raw trading-price history may look different. Readers need to know the provider’s adjustment method before comparing two charts. Do not combine a current raw quote with an adjusted historical series merely because both files use the same column heading. The finance graphs guide develops these measurement distinctions with additional worked examples.
Two invented series can both start at 100 and finish at 110. One might climb gradually; the other might rise to 140, fall to 85, and recover. An endpoint-only percentage is identical, but the experience described by the path is different. A good chart leaves enough of that path visible for the question being discussed.
Look for gaps, changes in variability, prolonged sideways periods, and the relationship between recent observations and the selected history. Describe what the chart shows before offering an explanation. “The closing price stayed between 96 and 102 for eight sessions” is an observation. “Investors became confident” is a claim about motives that cannot be established from that range alone.
Use a second time window as a context check. If a highlighted movement disappears in the wider view, decide whether the tight crop is still appropriate for your message. It may be, but the caption should tell readers that the display isolates a short interval rather than summarizing the entire history.
Volume adds a different measurement: the amount traded during an interval. It does not share the price unit, so a separate panel is often easier to read than placing everything on one unlabeled scale. Match its interval and timestamps to the price display. A daily price chart paired with weekly volume bars creates an unnecessary interpretive problem.
An unusually tall volume bar is a prompt to investigate, not a self-contained explanation. Compare like periods and inspect the data definition. A partial session is not directly comparable with a completed session. Activity from one venue is not automatically the same quantity as a consolidated market total.
For a small published image, a simple price panel and a compact volume panel may be enough. Give each a clear unit and preserve alignment across time. The volume chart tutorial explains how to calculate an illustrative baseline and annotate differences without presenting activity as a prediction.
Draft the caption in three parts: identify the measure, describe the visible relationship, and state an important limitation. For example: “Illustrative daily closing index, sessions 1–40. The final observation is above the starting observation, with several intervening declines. Synthetic data; not an investment result.” The wording remains valid when separated from the surrounding page.
Keep any annotation anchored to a visible observation. A label should explain a point or interval, not sit beside a line with an ambiguous target. Avoid unexplained arrows stretching into empty future space, which can make a historical display look like a forecast.
Before exporting, inspect the chart at the size readers will actually see. Check the title, axes, period, source note, and the meaning of each color. Provide a text summary and the supporting values where practical. A readable image and an accessible table serve different needs, so there is no reason to make readers choose between them.
Read identity, interval, scale, measure, path, and context in that order. This process will not tell you which investment to buy. It will help you distinguish what a chart records from what its presentation merely suggests. That distinction is the foundation of useful chart literacy.
When publishing, keep the data definition attached to the picture and use restrained language for interpretation. A strong stock chart does not need to promise a profitable pattern. It needs to make the displayed evidence understandable, verifiable, and proportionate to the conclusion being drawn.
All worked numerical examples are hypothetical. Educational material, not personal investment advice. See our data and editorial methodology.

Reconstruct open, high, low, and close, understand fill conventions, and distinguish a descriptive candle pattern from a prediction.
Read the guide
Give overlays, volume, and momentum measures separate jobs, document the settings, and keep historical summaries distinct from forecasts.
Read the guide
Work through a five-session simple moving average, warm-up values, smoothing, lag, and the settings a useful legend should preserve.
Read the guide